Day 2 in Armenia began slowly. After a good dose of coffee
and journaling, I decided I really needed a day to myself to do some exploring
and reflect. That morning EB and Alyson left to return to Georgia, but we
wanted to visit the Armenian Genocide Museum and Memorial. During the highly
controversial French law debate, the Armenians were celebrating and the Turks
were up in arms. The night before we visited the memorial, I had stayed up late
in the hostel sending emails in the downstairs lobby. With me were a few other
Armenian guys, watching the French Parliament vote on the law to make the
denial of the Armenian genocide illegal. I joined them in watching this
decision, and when the vote passed, the men literally threw piles of candy in
the air and danced around hugging each other! It was a moment I felt grateful
to be a part of. That day was a highly meaningful day for the Armenian people.
Many of my Turkish friends, though not all, were outraged at the French
decision. My students denounced France and were livid at the French government,
to say the least. So imagine our surprise finding ourselves in Armenia on the
night the resolution passed, and being lucky enough to visit the memorial the
next day. We headed to the Armenian Genocide Memorial which sits on top of a
huge hill overlooking the city. It is
dedicated to the victims killed by the Young Turks party in 1918. [For those of
you unfamiliar with this issue, it is a hotly contested issue- the Armenians
claim genocide of hundreds of thousands while the Turks strongly deny its
occurrence.] The memorial was made entirely of metal and stone, and reminded me
of several of the memorials in the Holocaust Museum in Israel, Yad VaShem. The
museum was closed, (apparently it closes for 2 months during the winter) much
to our dismay, but the memorial was profound. It was comprised of a circle of
steel columns leaning inward, protecting a single flame in the center. The
symbolism I found was two-fold. First, the standing pillars must always protect
the flame, fighting to burn continuously- a symbol of the struggle of
international recognition of the genocide. Second, the monument is always partially
in shadow: that the genocide was and continues to be partially covered,
shrouded. I later learned the true intent behind the structure, related to me by my tour guide. The tower symbolizes the birth of the nation and the twelve pillars surrounding the flame represent the twelve regions of Armenia they lost to other countries. There were gardens of trees surrounding the monuments planted in
memory of many Armenians. We saw a tree planted by Bob Dole, who I didn’t know
was a strong supporter of the recognition of the genocide. After spending
several minutes in silence and reflection, we headed to eat- and after I
visited the National Gallery, which had another section on the genocide with
some very interesting quotations. (See below)
Before parting our separate ways, John, Ramsey and I headed toa
café near the national gallery where I met a really amazing woman from Holland.
She and two friends were biking from Holland to China. The whole way! She
regaled us with some exciting adventures. (I am trying to find her blog for all
of you to follow!)
So off I went to the National Gallery, which is split into
two parts, the Art Museum and the National History Museum, where I chose to
spend the afternoon. What I learned that may be of some interest to my fellow
nerds:
1. The
region Armenia rests in was once ancient Assyria!
2. Warrior
costumes here were reminiscent of what my mind always imaged the great warriors
of old would look like; gold plated armor, pointy hats of bronze and thick
shields.
3. No
matter how far back you go in history, in every museum there are collections of
ancient jewelry. Really, women haven’t changed all that much!
4. From
the 7-13th centuries, the governments used coins in numerous
languages and all were accepted. But how did they make change? They literally
cut up the coins into smaller fragments for small change.
5. And
now to the controversial. Readers beware. People get pretty heated over the
following comments.
a. The
quotes below are taken word for word from the National History Museum’s section
on the genocide.
b. “Today,
all reputable specialists in Genocide Studies, who have firm scientific
principles and don’t yield to political considerations, consider the Armenian
genocide as the first genocide of the 20th century.”(1915)
c. They
[Young Turks- the Union and Progress political party] advanced a racial thesis
of forced conversion of all non-Turkic peoples, a thesis based on the idea of
Turks supremacy. One and a half million Armenians were killed who refused to
become Turks. One million were deported and exiled into the Arabian deserts.
The solution of the Armenian question was left to the Ottoman Empire
exclusively, who settled the matter in a Turkish manner, i.e. with a
sword.”
Hearing both extremely passionate perspectives has been an
eye-opening experience for me this year. I make no claims, and I am most
certainly not an expert. But I encourage you to research yourself. Knowledge is
everything.